Skip to main content
Are Home Warranties Worth the Cost?

Home warranties are often marketed as an affordable way to protect homeowners from expensive repairs. For rental property owners, however, the savings aren’t always what they appear to be.

At Rentals America, we generally recommend against purchasing home warranties for rental properties. Our experience coordinating maintenance has shown that repair delays, coverage exclusions, and limited control over contractors can create more problems than the warranty solves.

This is particularly important for Las Vegas landlords, where extreme summer heat makes prompt air conditioning repairs essential.

Rather than paying annual warranty premiums and service call fees (copays), we recommend putting that money into a maintenance reserve. Owners can then choose their own contractors, make repair-or-replace decisions, and address problems without waiting for warranty authorization.

What Is a Home Warranty, and How Does It Work?

A home warranty is a service contract that helps pay for repairs or replacements of certain household systems and appliances.

Coverage varies by provider and plan but may include:

  • Air conditioning and heating systems

  • Water heaters and plumbing

  • Electrical systems

  • Refrigerators, ovens, and dishwashers

  • Washers and dryers

Owners generally pay an annual premium plus a service fee whenever they submit a claim.

If the problem qualifies for coverage, the warranty company assigns a contractor and determines what work it will authorize.

The arrangement sounds convenient, particularly for owners concerned about unpredictable maintenance expenses.

However, a home warranty doesn’t guarantee that a repair will be completed quickly or that every associated expense will be covered.

Those limitations can be particularly troublesome when the property is occupied by a paying resident.

The Hidden Costs of Home Warranties for Rental Properties

The most important consideration isn’t simply how much a warranty company pays toward a repair. It’s the total cost of getting the problem resolved, including delays, uncovered charges, and the impact on the resident.

1. A Simple Repair Can Take 10–14 Days

One of the most frustrating problems we’ve encountered with home warranties involves replacement parts.

In some cases, rather than allowing the assigned contractor to purchase a part locally, the warranty company orders it directly and ships it to the contractor.

This may reduce the warranty company’s expenses, but it can significantly extend the repair timeline.

We’ve experienced situations where relatively simple repairs have taken 10–14 days because the warranty company insisted on supplying the replacement parts.

A homeowner might be willing to tolerate that delay. A rental property owner has responsibilities to the resident that can’t simply be postponed while waiting for a shipment.

This is especially problematic when the repair involves an air conditioner, water heater, or another essential system.

A delayed repair can also create expenses beyond the original maintenance bill, including potential resident remedies or compensation for loss of use.

In some circumstances, the cost of a delayed repair can far exceed the amount saved through the warranty.

2. Coverage Exclusions Can Make a Warranty Less Valuable Than Expected

Another common frustration is discovering that a covered repair still requires substantial out-of-pocket spending.

Consider a water heater replacement.

The warranty company may cover the new water heater but charge the owner separately for removing and disposing of the old equipment. We’ve encountered situations where those additional charges amount to hundreds of dollars.

Air conditioning repairs can present similar issues.

A warranty may pay for a failed component but exclude some or all of the refrigerant needed to complete the repair. Refrigerant can be expensive, particularly when a system requires a significant amount.

Other expenses may fall outside coverage limits or be excluded under the contract.

By the time the owner adds the annual premium, service call fees, and uncovered charges, the savings may be minimal.

The relevant comparison is the total amount the owner pays—not just the portion of the invoice covered by the warranty.

3. The Cheapest Repair Isn’t Always the Best Long-Term Decision

Home warranty companies often prefer repairing equipment rather than replacing it.

That can make sense when a system is otherwise in good condition. But when an older appliance or air conditioner experiences repeated failures, continued repairs may be less economical.

Each new breakdown can result in another service appointment, additional delays, and further disruption for the resident.

A rental property owner should be able to consider the equipment’s age, repair history, and expected remaining life when deciding whether replacement is appropriate.

With a warranty, those decisions are often influenced by what the provider is willing to authorize.

4. Owners Have Less Control Over Who Performs the Work

Most home warranty companies require the use of contractors from their approved network.

As a result, the owner may have little say in which contractor is assigned or how quickly the work can be scheduled.

At Rentals America, we coordinate maintenance through established vendors who understand the importance of responding promptly and working professionally in occupied rental homes.

Having the ability to select a contractor based on availability, reliability, and workmanship gives us more flexibility to resolve problems efficiently.

When a warranty company controls contractor selection, that flexibility is reduced.

5. Resident Dissatisfaction Can Become an Additional Expense

Maintenance problems affect more than the physical condition of a property.

When residents experience extended repair delays or repeated equipment failures, they may become frustrated with the rental experience.

That can affect their willingness to renew the lease.

If a resident moves out, the owner may incur vacancy costs, leasing expenses, and lost rental income.

A home warranty that saves money on one repair may provide little financial benefit if the process contributes to losing a good resident.

Why Home Warranties Can Be Particularly Risky for Las Vegas Landlords

Las Vegas summers make air conditioning one of the most important systems in a rental home.

When cooling equipment fails during extreme heat, prompt diagnosis and repair are critical.

Nevada law requires landlords to maintain supplied air-conditioning equipment in good repair. Under certain circumstances involving the loss of required essential services, including air conditioning, residents may have statutory remedies if the landlord fails to adequately address the problem after receiving the required notice.

For qualifying failures, Nevada law provides a 48-hour period, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, following receipt of written notice, during which the landlord must adequately remedy the breach or use best efforts to do so. The specific remedies depend on the circumstances and statutory requirements.

A warranty company’s approval process or parts-ordering schedule does not eliminate these obligations.

At Rentals America, we make an effort to coordinate covered repairs through an owner’s existing home warranty whenever practical.

However, when an urgent repair cannot be completed through the warranty provider within the timeframe required by applicable law, we may need to assign another qualified contractor.

That may mean the owner must pay for a repair that would otherwise have been covered.

Our priority is to protect the property, address the resident’s needs, and help the owner meet applicable maintenance obligations.

This is one reason we believe direct control over maintenance decisions is especially valuable for rental property owners.

When Might a Home Warranty Make Sense?

Although we generally discourage home warranties, there are situations where one may provide value.

A warranty included with the purchase of a home, for example, may offer some additional protection during the initial ownership period.

A policy may also provide meaningful savings if it covers a major replacement with relatively little out-of-pocket expense.

For owners with limited reserves, predictable premiums may seem preferable to the possibility of an unexpected large repair bill.

However, a warranty doesn’t eliminate the need for maintenance savings. Owners can still face uncovered expenses, and urgent work may need to be performed outside the warranty program.

The potential savings should be weighed against those limitations.

Our Preferred Alternative: Set Aside the Premiums and Copays

Instead of purchasing a home warranty, we recommend creating a dedicated maintenance reserve.

An easy starting point is to save the money that would otherwise go toward annual premiums and service call fees.

Here’s a hypothetical example:

               

Expense

Annual Amount

Home warranty premium

$700

Service call fees (copays)

$300

Total annual cost

$1,000

An owner who sets aside the same $1,000 each year would contribute $5,000 toward future repairs over five years, before accounting for repairs paid from the reserve or any interest earned.

This doesn’t mean the owner will necessarily have $5,000 remaining. Maintenance expenses will still occur, and major replacements may require additional savings.

But keeping those funds available offers important advantages:

  • Choose qualified contractors based on price, availability, and service quality.

  • Make repair-or-replace decisions based on long-term value rather than warranty restrictions.

  • Schedule work promptly without waiting for claim approvals.

  • Avoid unexpected coverage disputes over exclusions and additional charges.

  • Respond more effectively to urgent repairs affecting residents.

Owners should maintain sufficient additional reserves for major expenses, particularly when HVAC systems or other equipment are nearing the end of their useful lives.

For more information about planning and managing maintenance expenses, see our Rental Property Maintenance Guide. [Website team: insert verified Las Vegas guide link.]

Our Recommendation: Skip the Warranty and Keep Control

In our experience, home warranties generally create more limitations than benefits for rental property owners.

The promise of lower repair costs is appealing, but delays, exclusions, repeated service calls, and contractor restrictions can substantially reduce the value of coverage.

We recommend setting aside the money you would otherwise spend on warranty premiums and copays and using reliable contractors who can complete repairs promptly.

For landlords, the best maintenance decision isn’t always the one with the lowest immediate repair bill. It’s the one that protects the property, serves residents well, and controls costs over the long term.

Frequently Asked Questions


Are home warranties worth it for Las Vegas rental properties?

Generally, we don’t recommend them. Although a warranty can occasionally save money on a major repair, coverage limitations, service fees, and delays often reduce or eliminate the financial benefit.

Do home warranties cover air conditioning repairs?

Many home warranties include HVAC coverage, but the details vary. Refrigerant, certain installation expenses, and other costs may be excluded or subject to coverage limits.

Can a landlord choose their own contractor with a home warranty?

Most warranty providers require approved contractors. Some may authorize outside vendors in advance, but hiring an unapproved contractor can result in a denied claim.

What happens if a warranty company delays an essential repair?

The landlord remains responsible for complying with applicable maintenance requirements. If a warranty provider cannot respond promptly enough, another contractor may be needed. Nevada law also provides potential resident remedies for qualifying failures involving essential services, subject to notice and other statutory conditions.

Is saving for repairs better than purchasing a home warranty?

For owners who can maintain adequate reserves, we generally believe so. Saving the money otherwise spent on premiums and service fees provides more flexibility over contractor selection, repair decisions, and scheduling.

back